Turning an industrial by-product into a sustainable solution for desert agriculture
Water Savings
Scale Prevention
Sustainability Potential
Agriculture in arid regions is defined by a fundamental contradiction: crops need a cool, moist environment to thrive, but the external climate is hot and dry. Greenhouses protect plants, but their internal temperature must be carefully managed.
The most common method for cooling greenhouses in hot climates is evaporative cooling 2 . These systems, often called "fan and pad" coolers, work by drawing hot, dry air through water-soaked pads. The evaporation of water cools the air, which is then circulated through the greenhouse.
While effective at lowering temperatures, this process consumes massive amounts of water. Furthermore, in areas where the only available water is alkaline or rich in dissolved salts, a new problem arises: scale formation 4 .
This challenge sits at the heart of what researchers call the Food-Energy-Water (FEW) nexus 1 . It describes the inextricable link between the three resources: producing more food requires more water and energy, while providing more water and energy often impacts the other two.
Traditional cooling systems consume massive amounts of water, straining limited resources in arid regions.
Clogged systems require more energy to operate, increasing costs and carbon footprint.
Inefficient systems threaten food production by creating unsustainable operating conditions.
Sulfur is one of the most abundant elements on Earth, and in the oil and gas industries of the Gulf region, it is a major by-product. During the processing of "sour" gas, highly toxic hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) is removed and converted into elemental sulfur through the Claus process 6 .
While essential for making sulfuric acid and fertilizers, the global supply of sulfur often exceeds demand, leading to large stockpiles 6 . Researchers are now developing innovative and sustainable applications for this surplus material, creating valuable products from an involuntary resource 6 .
Sulfur has two primary agricultural uses that are key to this story: as a pesticide and as a water treatment agent.
For years, greenhouse growers have used sulfur as a natural fungicide and acaricide (mite-killer) to control diseases like powdery mildew. It can be applied as a dust, spray, or, most relevantly, through evaporation 3 . Sulfur evaporators, a common technique in places like the Netherlands and Spain, heat sulfur to create sulfur dioxide (SO₂) vapor, which disperses throughout the greenhouse and prevents fungal spores from germinating 3 .
A pivotal study conducted in the UAE directly addressed the challenge of scale in greenhouse cooling systems using sulfur burning technology 4 . The experiment provided a clear, practical demonstration of how this technology could enhance water efficiency.
The team utilized sulfur burning equipment to produce sulfur dioxide gas. This gas was then dissolved in water, creating an acidified solution with an average pH of 6.5—sufficiently acidic to dissolve mineral scale but mild enough to be safe for the cooling system infrastructure 4 .
Eight greenhouses suffering from moderate to severe scaling in their cooling pads were selected for the study 4 .
Six of the greenhouses were treated with the acidified water. The solution was introduced into the cooling systems, where it circulated through the pads and pipes. The remaining two greenhouses were left as untreated controls for comparison 4 .
The researchers monitored the cooling systems for changes in scale buildup, airflow, and overall cooling efficiency.
The experiment yielded promising results. The use of acidified water successfully removed existing scale deposits and, with continued use, prevented their recurrence 4 .
The primary mechanism is straightforward: the mineral scale (primarily calcium carbonate) reacts with the weak acid, dissolving into soluble salts that are then flushed out of the system. By keeping the cooling pads free of scale, the greenhouse operators could maintain optimal airflow and cooling performance. This meant the systems used water and energy more efficiently, leading to direct reductions in resource consumption and operational costs 4 .
100% effective in treated greenhouses
| Group | Number of Greenhouses | Treatment | Key Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Group | 6 | Acidified water (pH 6.5) from sulfur burning | Successful removal and prevention of scaling |
| Control Group | 2 | No treatment | Scaling persisted, leading to reduced efficiency |
Implementing a sulfur-based water treatment system requires several key components, each playing a vital role in the process.
An industrial device designed to combust elemental sulfur in a controlled manner to produce sulfur dioxide (SO₂) gas 7 .
A chamber where the SO₂ gas is safely dissolved into the greenhouse's cooling water stream, creating the weak acid solution 4 .
Sensors that continuously monitor the pH of the water, ensuring it remains at the optimal level (around 6.5) for effective descaling without being corrosive 4 .
The raw material, often available as a granular by-product from the oil and gas industry 6 .
The implications of this technology extend far beyond clean cooling pads. By integrating sulfur burning, greenhouses can move closer to the closed-loop systems that are the hallmark of sustainable agriculture.
The direct water savings are significant. A clean cooling system can operate at peak efficiency, with some greenhouse projects in the UAE reporting water savings of up to 75% through a combination of advanced technologies, including efficient cooling and water recycling 8 .
Furthermore, an unclogged system requires less energy to push air through it, reducing the greenhouse's energy footprint and operational costs. This directly addresses the FEW nexus by creating a positive link between water conservation and energy efficiency 1 .
Water Savings Achieved
Sulfur burning is part of a larger toolkit of high-tech solutions being deployed in modern greenhouses. These often work in synergy:
Advanced greenhouses capture and reuse every drop of water, including irrigation runoff and, most impressively, water transpired by the plants themselves. Closed-loop systems can recover over 1 kg of distilled water per square meter daily 8 .
Sulfur burning creates a circular economy model where an industrial by-product becomes a valuable agricultural resource, reducing waste and improving sustainability.
| Technology | Principle | Advantages | Challenges |
|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional Evaporative Cooling | Cools air through water evaporation | Effective, relatively low-cost | High water use, prone to scaling |
| Sulfur-Based Water Treatment | Prevents scale in cooling systems with acidified water | Boosts efficiency of existing systems, uses a by-product | Requires initial investment in equipment |
| Liquid Desiccant Systems | Uses a salt solution (e.g., CaCl₂) to absorb moisture from air | Actively dehumidifies and can harvest water for reuse | More complex and energy-intensive for dehumidification 5 |
The story of sulfur in the greenhouse is a powerful example of circular thinking. It demonstrates how a waste product from one industry can be transformed into a valuable resource for another, closing a loop in our industrial ecosystem. What was once a material stockpiled as a problem is now being viewed as a key ingredient for sustainable agriculture in arid regions 6 .
By solving the persistent issue of scaling, sulfur-burning technology helps ensure that every drop of water used in desert greenhouses goes further. This innovation, combined with water recycling, smart sensors, and advanced dehumidification, is paving the way for a future where arid regions can produce their own fresh, local food without depleting their precious water reserves. In the quest to meet the world's growing food demands sustainably, the humble sulfur burner has proven to be an unexpected but vital ally.